Saturday, April 28, 2012

Final Project


Wrangell, Alaska
Timeline:
This picture was taken in 1914 on the Great Glacier 
on the Stikine River.  Imagine how big that glacier
 was thousands of years ago! 
Thousands of Years Ago: Tlingit people moved down the Stikine River to Wrangell Island.  “Tlingit migration lore tells of their people’s travel west looking for a new homeland. They encountered a glacier that was too great to cross. A meltwater tunnel was visible at its base and several young men volunteered to attempt a passage through the crevasse. At the last moment, a couple of elders took the trip upon themselves fearing loss of the youth to the future of the group. These elders passed safety through the glacier and found the rich land of Southeast Alaska, Lingít Aaní. The remaining people followed their elders into their new land and became the first Tlingits” (Sorum). 


 Ferdinand Von Wrangell
1834: Ferdinand Von Wrangell, the manager of the Russian-American Company, established a stockade, called Redoubt Saint Dionysius, in Wrangell to protect the fur trade from Hudson’s Bay Company (Sorum).  
1839: The British Hudson’s Bay Company leased land and founded Fort Stikine to replace Redoubt St. Dionysius.  Fort Stikine remained under British rule until Alaska was purchased by the United States (Sorum).  




1867: The United States bought Alaska from Russia giving Wrangell the unique status as the only Alaskan city to have been governed under four nations: Tlingit, Russian, British, American (Alaska Airlines). 
Route from Wrangell, AK to Cassiar, BC
1877: The Cassiar Gold Rush occurred after a prospector found a 72 ounce gold nugget; it was the largest nugget ever recorded in British Columbia.  The Stikine served as an important transportation route for prospectors and Wrangell was one of the first jumping off points for the route to Cassiar (Heritage BC).


1889: The first sawmill in Alaska was located in Wrangell (Wrangell). 







1902: A weekly newspaper, The Wrangell Sentinel, printed its first issue November 2, 1902.  It is the oldest continuous publication in Alaska (American Local History Network). 

1932: The Wrangell Institute was built by the U.S. Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) and used as a boarding school for Native children until the 1970s (Alaska). 


Wrangell Lumber Mill Site
Current Economic Issues: Wrangell’s economy took a hit when the timber mill closed in the mid 1990‘s.  Many people left the community to find new jobs.  Even today the community still faces the challenge of reusing the large industrial site.  Carol Rushmore, City and Borough of Wrangell, Economic Development Director, stated that the mill site is privately owned but the community is interested in working with landowner to sell or develop the property to create jobs.  Other issues currently confronting the community of Wrangell include finding a way to increase the tourism industry without having an impact on residential quality of life, utilization of the 134 acres of great real estate which was once the Wrangell Institute, maintaining transportation to and from the island, and obtaining the necessary services and infrastructure for the aging population.  
Cause-Effect Statements:
1) Located at the mouth of the Stikine River, Wrangell, Alaska has been called home to people of all ranges, from fur traders to fishermen, for centuries. 
Two items linked: Settlement and Economy

2) The Stikine served as an important transportation route for building material being shipped to Watson Lake during World War II (Sorum).  At the same time Aleut people where relocated and place in the Wrangell Institute while the Aleutian Islands were under attack (Alaska). 
Two+ items linked: Transportation, Cultural History, Education, and WWII

3) In 1889, the first sawmill in Alaska was located in Wrangell (SEAtrails).  The sawmill was Wrangell’s largest employer until it closed in 1994.  Many people left the community to find new jobs. While the economy of Wrangell has balanced itself out again and the population has slowly risen, the community still faces the challenge of reusing the large industrial site that once was the sawmill.  
Two items linked: Economy and Contemporary Issues


Friday, April 13, 2012

Module IX-Alaska Governance and Contemporary Issues

Essential: Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act 1980 has been supported and derided by Alaskans, both in 1980 when it was passed and today.  Describe three impacts of this landmark legislation.
In 1980, United States Congress passed the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (ANILCA).  ANILCA was a compromise that set aside 104 million acres of federal land in Alaska under the status of monuments, preserves, and wildlife refuges as well as adding to the national park and national forest systems (Modern Alaska: ANILCA).
https://www.institutenorth.org/programs/alaska-commons/anilca-seminars 
After decades of disputes over Alaska’s pristine land, a compromise was finally reached.  Under ANILCA, the federal government owns sixty percent of Alaska. Regulations of mining, cabin building, road/trail building, use of motorized vehicles, use of tools such as chain saws, hunting, fishing, recreational activities were put in place (Explore Alaska).  

ANILCA was called "the most important environmental legislation in the history of the nation” (Modern Alaska: ANILCA).  

In Module V, we discussed the history of Alaska’s mining.  While mining enticed prospectors to settle in Alaska and build communities, it also had many harmful effects on the environment.  ANILCA brought protection to a significant area of the state that was previously open to mining and other kinds of entry.
Another part of ANILCA that is near and dear to Alaskans is a federal guarantee of a rural preference for the subsistence harvest of traditional resources, fish, and game.  Subsistence is both a cultural way of life and an economic necessity in many Alaska villages.  People must hunt and fish in order to survive. 

Unfortunately, the rural preference in ANILCA is in conflict with the state constitution.  As a result of the state being out of compliance with ANILCA, the federal government took over management of subsistence hunting on federal lands (Modern Alaska: Subsistence).  

ANILCA has continued to be a source of controversy since it was passed in 1980. 
Examine: Describe the major periods of Alaska governance.
Following the purchase of Alaska in 1867 were four distinct periods called Era of Neglect, District, Territory, and State.  
The Era of Neglect started in 1867 and ended in 1884.  During the first ten years of this period the United States Army had a presence in Alaska.  The army made an attempt to cut off the sale of liquor to Natives and protect them from non-Native abuse.  The Sitka Tlingits became hostile once the army was gone and Americans requested federal assistance.  Finally in 1879, the navy sent in a ship with powerful guns and the Sitka Natives became less hostile.  Southeast Alaska was essentially the only part of Alaska to received any aid during the first period.  With a state the size of Alaska it is obvious why this period is called the Era of Neglect (Alaska’s Heritage).  
Kodiak, AK ca. 1900 and 1923.
 http://www.topdesignmag.com/40-stunning-old-photos/ 
The District period began in 1884 and ended in 1912.  During the second period Alaska began to create a government.  In 1884, US Congress established a civilian government for Alaska under the First Organic Act.  “It authorized a district governor and a court system for Alaska. The First Organic Act also applied the laws of the State of Oregon to Alaska ‘so far as they may be applicable.’ It extended federal mining laws to Alaska so that miners could legally file claims on mineral-rich land. In addition, a federal land office opened at Sitka to administer a land district that included all of Alaska” (Alaska’s Heritage).  Alaskans were still not satisfied so in 1900 Congress approved a Civil Code which revised the First Organic Act resulting in more laws for Alaska.  
The Second Organic Act established Alaska as a territory, rather than a district.  The Territory period started in 1912 and ended in 1959.  Alaska was allowed to vote for a representative of their territory.  The territorial legislature had 24 members, two senators and four representatives from each of the four judicial districts.  Alaskans finally had the ability to pass laws that governed their communities (Alaska’s Heritage).  
http://blog.rarenewspapers.com/?p=912



The final period of Alaska governance, the State period, began on January 3, 1959 when Alaska became the 49th state of the United States.  Becoming a State meant Alaskans were given voting representation in Congress.  The Alaskan presence in Congress led to new federal policies, programs, and services (Alaska’s Heritage). 

  



Extend: How might you use content from this module in your professional practice?
A map of Alaska produced by the Alaska Division of Economic Development
shows all the current producing and developing mines in the state as of 2010.
 http://homertribune.com/2010/11/five-gold-coal-mines-detail-energy-needs/ 

Much of the information in this module could be used in a science classroom.  I am specifically drawn to the current issues list at the end of the lesson.  In my Biology classes we are currently focusing on Human Impact on the Environment.  As part of a place-based experience, we are focusing on what is going on in Wrangell.  This list gives me great ideas for current issues in our home state as well!  




Evaluate: Write a brief paragraph reflecting on the content, style, and usefulness of this first module.

Module IX was full with SO MUCH great information!  I really enjoyed the resources about the Alaska PFDs.  As a newcomer to Alaska, I was excited to fill out my application for next years PFD and I had not thought too much about where the money comes from or what else it could be used for.  The prospect of getting money for simply existing is exciting, but also pretty silly.  Thank you for the excellent resources and thought provoking module about Alaska’s PFD and other current issues.  



Resources:
Alaska History & Cultural Studies. (2012). Alaska’s Heritage: Alaskans and the United States. Retrieved from http://www.akhistorycourse.org/articles/article.php?artID=170 
Alaska History & Cultural Studies. (2012). Modern Alaska: ANILCA. Retrieved from http://www.akhistorycourse.org/articles/article.php?artID=256 
Alaska History & Cultural Studies. (2012). Modern Alaska: Subsistence. Retrieved from http://www.akhistorycourse.org/articles/article.php?artID=259 
Campen, Brenda. (2012). Module V - Minerals: Gold, Black Gold & all the Rest. Retrieved from http://explorealaskablog.blogspot.com/2011/11/module-v-c-alaskas-economy-minerals-big.html 
Campen, Brenda. (2012). Module IX - ANSCA, ANILCA, Subsistence, and Fed./State Relations. Retrieved from http://explorealaskablog.blogspot.com/2011/10/module-ix-d-ancsa-anilca-fedstate.html 
Campen, Brenda. (2012). Module IX - Current Issues. Retrieved from http://explorealaskablog.blogspot.com/2012/04/module-ix-e-current-issues.html 
Colleague Blogs:

Excited About Alaska: Kelley has presented great information about Native Corporations, a topic I know very little about.  I enjoyed reading her blog and look forward to learning more about the Native Corporation in my region of Alaska.  

Latitude 61: I enjoyed reading about the government officials and tribal government.  I thought about answering this question, but did not know where to start.  Crystal did a great job including links and other helpful information.  
Explore Alaska Class: This week was the first time I had heard of the Native Youth Olympics (NYO).  Nikki also mentioned NYO in here blog and had a link to the website.  I am excited to take a closer look into this awesome celebration of heritage and community! 

Wednesday, April 4, 2012

Module VIII - World War II 1939-45 A Turning Point for Alaska

Essential: Explain how Alaska's location was considered 'strategic' during World War II. What were the war activities/events that supported the perspective of 'strategic' Alaska?
Since before it was purchased in 1867, Alaska’s significance in a Pacific Ocean war had been known.  President Abraham Lincoln is said to have commented on the United States' need for North Pacific naval bases (Alaskans & the World).  Also according to Matthew Hunter, “In the early twentieth century US relations with Japan began to fall apart. Military planers began to realize how important Alaska would be if there was a war in the Pacific. Alaska was within flying distance of Japan and the rest United States. Survival would depend on keeping it under our control.”  

Japanese Advancement
 
http://www.history.army.mil/brochures/aleut/aleut.htm
Japan also was aware of the importance of Alaska’s location in the Pacific Ocean.  Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto planned to “invade and occupy strategic points in the Western Aleutians as well as Midway Island on the western tip of the Hawaiian chain”(US Army).  Yamamoto wanted to set up a defensive perimeter in the Pacific and destroy the United States Pacific Fleet.  He attacked the Aleutian Islands in 1942 to lure the already weakened American fleet from Pearl Harbor and annihilate it before new construction could replace the losses it had sustained on December 7, 1941 (US Army).  Fortunately the United States was victorious at Midway, deterring Yamamoto’s plans, and the Aleutians remained part of the United States (Clancey).  
Examine: What was the rationale for the Lend-Lease ALSIB project?
The Lend-Lease Alaska- Siberia (ALSIB) project was the “name of the program under which the United States of America supplied the United Kingdom, the Soviet Union, China, France and other Allied nations with vast amounts of war material between 1941 and 1945” (Bravo 369).
It is known that in the initial stage of the war, the Soviet Union suffered from the lack of ammunition, food supply, and strategic materials.  Then in June of 1941, Germany attacked the Soviet Union.  In October of 1941, the United States extended the First Protocol of Lend-Lease aid to the Soviets.  The rationale for giving aide to the Soviets was to stand with a “united front against the powers confessing fascism and militarism” (Alaska/Siberia Connection).
ALSIB Lend-Lease
 http://aksrc.homestead.com/Maps.html
The Second Protocol of the Lend-Lease project was established in 1942 and the ALSIB air route was put into action.  “American pilots would ferry the newly manufactured planes from the factories to Gore Field and later to East Base at Great Falls, Montana. With Canadian cooperation, they would bring the aircraft to Alaska along the Northwest Staging Route, the pioneer inland air route through western Canada and into interior Alaska.49 At Ladd Field, Soviets would take delivery of the planes, fly them to Galena, Nome, and then on to the Siberian portion of lines” (Colorado State University).  
While there was much dispute for years afterward whether the aid was appropriate and who should have paid for it, the wartime alliance between the United States and the Soviet Union served its purpose of defeating the Axis, and ALSIB Lend-Lease contributed in some measure to the victory (Colorado State University).  

Extend: How might you use content from this module in your professional practice?
Google Earth
The content in Module VIII could be utilized as a critical thinking question in my science classroom while students learn about latitude and longitude.  To comprehend what the numbers mean in relation to distance, I would want students to study Alaska and its location.  It has been mentioned before in this class that Alaskans often feel like they are on the edge of the world, while Alaska is actually a central location.  I would ask students why the location of Alaska was considered 'strategic' during World War IIThe students would have to understand latitude and longitude of Alaska as well as the locations of Japan and Russia in order to properly answer the question.  It is wonderful to be able to intertwine History and Science, they are so dependent on one another.  
Evaluate: Write a brief paragraph reflecting on the content, style, and usefulness of this first module.
In one of the readings for Module VIII, it was mentioned that many students were never taught about the Japanese attack on the Aleutian Islands.  I was one of those students until now.  In fact, when I saw the Module title I was a bit confused on what we could possibly discuss.  I enjoyed learning about Alaska’s role in WWII and am excited to reference this knowledge in my classroom.  
Resources:
Alaska History & Cultural Studies. (2012). Alaska Heritage: Alaskans and the World. Retrieved from http://www.akhistorycourse.org/articles/article.php?artID=172 
Alaska/Siberia Connection. (2012). Alaska/Siberia Connection. Retrieved from http://alaskasiberia.com
Bravo 369 Flight Foundation. (2011). Lend-Lease History. Retrieved from http://www.bravo369.org/lend%20lease/lend.html 
Clancey, Patrick. (1998). The Aleutians Campaign. Retrieved from http://www.ibiblio.org/hyperwar/USN/Aleutians/USN-CN-Aleutians-Intro.html 
Colorado State University. (n.d.). The World War II Heritage of Ladd Field. Retrieved from http://www.usarak.army.mil/conservation/WWII_LaddField/Ch5.pdf 
Hunter, Matthew. (2006). Sitka’s WWII Site. Retrieved from http://mchunter1.tripod.com/sitkaww2.html# & http://www.sitkaww2.com
US Army Center of Military History. (2003). Aleutian Islands. Retrieved from http://www.history.army.mil/brochures/aleut/aleut.htm  
Colleagues Blogs:

Diane is Exploring Alaska: Diane wrote about the harsh reality of moving the Aleuts to Southeast Alaska during the Aleutian Campaign of WWII.  I had skipped over the treatment of these people while reading this module and was saddened to read her post.  

Exploring Alaska’s Culture: Shannon chose to answer the same questions as I did for Module VIII.  I enjoyed reading her answers because they focused on different concepts than mine did.  She mentioned the building of the Alcan Highway and it’s importance to Alaska’s strategic location during WWII.
Alaskan History - A Newcomers Perspective: Claire did a great job capturing my attention with her opening paragraph.  She quoted Billy Mitchell and General Paul Hester talking about Alaska’s strategic location.